Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2303170

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While previous studies described the production of IgG-antibodies in a subgroup of CVID-patients following mRNA-vaccinations with bnt162b2 SARS-CoV2 (CVID responders), the functionality of these antibodies in terms of avidity as measured by the dissociation rate constant (kdis) and the antibody response to booster immunization has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: In CVID responders and healthy individuals the avidity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum-antibodies and their neutralization capacity as measured by surrogate virus neutralizing antibodies were analyzed in addition to IgG-, IgM- and IgA-antibody levels and the response of circulating follicular T-helper cells after a third vaccination with BNT162b2 SARS-CoV2 mRNA-vaccine. METHODS: Binding IgG, IgA and IgM serum levels were analyzed by ELISA in CVID-patients responding to the primary vaccination (CVID responders, n=10) and healthy controls (n=41). The binding-avidity of anti-spike antibodies was investigated using biolayer interferometry in combination with biotin-labelled receptor-binding-domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV2 spike-protein and streptavidin-labelled sensors. Antigen-specific recall T-cell responses were assessed by measuring activation-induced markers by flow cytometry. RESULTS: After the third vaccination with BNT162b2 IgG-, IgM and IgA-antibody levels, sVNT levels and antibody avidity were lower in CVID responders as compared to healthy. In contrast αSpike-avidity was comparable in CVID responders and healthy individuals following primary vaccination. Follicular T-helper cell response to booster vaccination in CVID-responders was significantly reduced when compared to healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: Impaired affinity-maturation during booster-response provides new insight into CVID pathophysiology.

2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 11(1): 107-115, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2165477

ABSTRACT

In the past 10 years, we have witnessed major advances in clinical immunology. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency has become universal in the United States and screening programs are being extended to severe combined immunodeficiency and other inborn errors of immunity globally. Early genetic testing is becoming the norm for many of our patients and allows for informed selection of targeted therapies including biologics repurposed from other specialties. During the COVID-19 pandemic, our understanding of essential immune responses expanded and the discovery of immune gene defects continued. Immunoglobulin products, the backbone of protection for antibody deficiency syndromes, came into use to minimize side effects. New polyclonal and monoclonal antibody products emerged with increasing options to manage respiratory viral agents such as SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory syncytial virus. Against these advances, we still face major challenges. Atypical is becoming typical as phenotypes of distinct genetic disease overlap whereas the clinical spectrum of the same genetic defect widens. Therefore, clinical judgment needs to be paired with repeated deep immune phenotyping and upfront genetic testing, as technologies rapidly evolve, and clinical disease often progresses with age. Managing patients with organ damage resulting from immune dysregulation poses a special major clinical challenge and management often lacks standardization, from autoimmune cytopenias, granulomatous interstitial lung disease, enteropathy, and liver disease to endocrine, rheumatologic, and neurologic complications. Clinical, translational, and basic science networks will continue to advance the field; however, cross-talk and education with practicing allergists/immunologists are essential to keep up with the ever-changing clinical and genetic landscape of inborn errors of immunity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes , Severe Combined Immunodeficiency , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/genetics
3.
Blood Rev ; 55: 100948, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031169

ABSTRACT

Immunodeficiency syndromes represent a diverse group of inherited and acquired disorders, characterized by a spectrum of clinical manifestations, including recurrent infections, autoimmunity, lymphoproliferation and malignancy. Autoantibodies against various self-antigens reflect the immune dysregulation underlying these disorders, and could contribute to certain clinical findings, such as susceptibility to opportunistic infections, cytopenia of different hematopoietic lineages, and organ-specific autoimmune diseases. The mechanism of autoantibody production in the context of immunodeficiency remains largely unknown but is likely shaped by both intrinsic genetic aberrations and extrinsic exposures to possible infectious agents. These autoantibodies if harbor neutralizing activities and reach certain levels in the circulation, could disrupt the biological functions of their targets, resulting in specific clinical manifestations. Herein, we reviewed the prevalence of autoantibodies against cytokines, hematopoietic cells and organ-specific antigens in immunodeficiency syndromes and examined their associations with certain clinical findings. Moreover, the potential mechanism of autoantibody production was also discussed. These may shed light on the development of mechanism-based therapies to reset the dysregulated immune system in immunodeficient patients.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Autoimmune Diseases , Autoimmune Diseases/etiology , Autoimmunity , Cytokines , Humans , Syndrome
4.
Frontiers in immunology ; 13, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1710963

ABSTRACT

Previous studies on immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) were inconclusive with respect to the ability of the patients to produce vaccine-specific IgG antibodies, while patients with milder forms of primary antibody deficiency such as immunoglobulin isotype deficiency or selective antibody deficiency have not been studied at all. In this study we examined antigen-specific activation of CXCR5-positive and CXCR5-negative CD4+ memory cells and also isotype-specific and functional antibody responses in patients with CVID as compared to other milder forms of primary antibody deficiency and healthy controls six weeks after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Expression of the activation markers CD25 and CD134 was examined by multi-color flow cytometry on CD4+ T cell subsets stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 spike peptides, while in parallel IgG and IgA antibodies and surrogate virus neutralization antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured by ELISA. The results show that in CVID and patients with other milder forms of antibody deficiency normal IgG responses (titers of spike protein-specific IgG three times the detection limit or more) were associated with intact vaccine-specific activation of CXCR5-negative CD4+ memory T cells, despite defective activation of circulating T follicular helper cells. In contrast, CVID IgG nonresponders showed defective vaccine-specific and superantigen-induced activation of both CD4+T cell subsets. In conclusion, impaired TCR-mediated activation of CXCR5-negative CD4+ memory T cells following stimulation with vaccine antigen or superantigen identifies patients with primary antibody deficiency and impaired IgG responses after BNT162b2 vaccination.

5.
Lancet Rheumatol ; 3(4): e246-e247, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1228199
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL